Saturday, January 21, 2006 - Posts

Rangers V Livingston

Not a great game but a few weeks ago we were failing to win these games; now we are scoring goals and winning without playing particularly well.  The difference is that we can score goals now. 

We dominated the first half of today’s game and if it wasn’t for previous games this season I would have been confident of winning comfortably.  The only disappointments were failing to score a second goal after starting so brightly, the injury to Kyrgiakos and the lack of passing ability of Chris Burke; belying his recent excellent form. 

In the second half, the defence started to look very suspect.  Andrews and Murray is not a central defensive partnership that you would feel at all confident in.  Andrews needs an experienced central defender alongside him and Murray is not it.  It was no surprise when Livingston equalised and the thoughts turned to other games this season when Rangers had thrown away a lead. 

This seems to be a new Rangers, though.  They immediately stepped up their level of performance and very quickly went back into the lead.  This goal, the second of the day from Kris Boyd, looked like being all that would separate the sides until, the newly re-introduced, Dado Prso emulated Boyd by scoring two excellent late goals.  The Rangers attack suddenly looks good.  Lovenkrands, Boyd, Novo and Prso all looked potent and the four goal haul was well deserved. 

The worry is in defence.  Not only the defenders, but also the defensive abilities of the midfielders.  The amount of space that the Livingston forwards were finding in the Rangers half made for a worrying game for much of the second half.  Considering the ability of the Livingston midfield, this is worrying with much harder games coming up.  We do have Rodrigeuz and Hemdami still to return from injury but will have to improve significantly in this area. 

The transfer window is still open, isn’t it?


Learning Philosophy - Lesson 2

The philosophy class that we are taking runs on a Saturday morning at 10am.  This should be pretty convenient for us but this morning we managed to arrive late.  Penny’s car died on her way home last night.  She was too busy panicking to ask what a Wise person would do.  This morning, I had to visit the garage so we arrived at the class 15 minutes late to find Martin all alone; no one else had turned up.  We started anyway and Margaret also arrived 10 minutes later so it was not quite as alive a debate as last week but interesting none the less.

We first of all refreshed what we had covered last week with Martin emphasising that this was “practical philosophy”, so the point is to apply the lessons and live a better life.  I asked about the “State of our being”, a phrase that was used in last week‘s hand-out.  Martin explained this as about how we feel, a state that varies from time to time.  We may be feeling stressed, relaxed, curious, lethargic etc.

Martin then introduced the  subject of principles.  These being beliefs or modes of behaviour that influence how we lead our life.  The actions of a Wise Man are guided by lasting principles rather than by selfish or fleeting concerns.

Examples of this type of principle include:
1. Do to others as you would have others do to you.
2. Live honestly, harm no man and render to each his due.

The most important principle for wisdom is that of self-knowledge.  Doubt about your self is reflected everywhere.  This principle is reflected in many philosophical texts.  For example:
1. Whoever knows essentially his own nature, can know also that of other men and can penetrate into the nature of beings.
2. This above all: to thine ownself be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man.

This principle begs the question of “what is ‘self’?”  We each have different attributes that are displayed at different times in our lives, when we are in different roles and when we are in different states of being.  What is constant between these?  We should learn to appreciate that which is unchanging in our selves.  What is the essence of our selves?  Part of this is made up of our identity.  Our identity is not simply formed by our experiences; there is also a part made from our innate nature; our genetic heritage. 

This is illustrated by the tale of a lion cub that is brought up as a sheep.  He behaves exactly like a sheep while that is his only frame of reference.  One day, an adult lion comes along and roars at the flock of sheep.  They all run off, but the lion stays; it recognises an affinity for this other creature; maybe just a similarity of form, but maybe a deeper affinity.  The lion cub follows the lion, is taken under the influence of the lion and from that point on acts like a lion.

Real life examples of this sort of thing seem to show that the lion cub could never really be one or the other.  It will always be different; never fully part of either group.  This reminded me very much of Stranger in a Strange Land.  The human child, Mike, is brought up by an alien race and adopts their frame of reference.  When “rescued” and brought back to human society, he struggles to make the adjustment.  He does not feel part of the human race but eventually recognises that he is more human than alien.

Another important principle is that of neither accepting nor rejecting but putting into practice.  Ideas that are put to you should not be dismissed out of hand; neither should they be accepted uncritically.  Instead, they should be tried out and the results observed. 

An example of this is the story from Bede’s History of the English Church and People.  When Augustine came to England to preach to the natives, the Saxon King, Ethelbert, listened to what he had to say and did not accept or reject it.  Instead, acting for his kingdom, he allowed Augustine to preach and evaluated the results.  It is important to observe the results of an action before you can evaluate a theory.  This is the basis of the scientific method but is also vital in the evaluations performed by the wise.

This is related to the principle of having an open mind.  Hear with an open mind; apply your learning and observe the effect.

Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen.

Nan-in served Tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.
The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!"

"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"

We all have “opinions and speculations”; most of what we do and think is by habit.  We should examine our habits and bring our reason to bear on them.  Are they reasonable? 

We should also continue to ask what a wise man or woman would do.

And keep practicing the exercise from lesson 1.