Saturday, January 28, 2006 - Posts

Learning Philosophy Lesson 3

Last week, we had looked at principles; how the wise man will be driven by timeless principles and not by temporary selfish desires.  We looked at the most important principle of all for learning wisdom; self knowledge and we talked about what we meant by the self; the drives, memories, emotions and knowledge that make up a cohesive identity.

This week we started to look at the difference between knowledge and information. Information is not enough to actually succeed in doing something; knowledge comes from applying that information and getting feedback.  We cannot be told how to drive a car and simply go and do it successfully.  We need to practice and get feedback from our attempts. 

Feedback always helps us to assess the information that we have.  It is like the scientific method; we have a theory and we test that theory by performing actions and evaluating the results to see if they are consistent with the theory.  In philosophy, this theory will often come in the form of teachings, at other times, it will be developed from introspections or other observations.  However it comes to us, though, we should not simply accept it; we should apply the knowledge and observe the results to see if they theory makes sense in light of the evidence.

There are different levels of awareness.  This was presented as a gradient with from the lowest levels of awareness to the highest levels.

    Higher consciousness
    Fully awake
    Waking sleep
    Dream
    Deep sleep

In deep sleep we have only the most limited awareness; it can take a lot to wake us and we are generally unaware of events.

When we are dreaming, we have more awareness. In particular, we will have awareness of the world that we imagine while dreaming.  We may even be aware of the fact that we are dreaming, a “lucid dream“.  We can also be influenced by external events; an alarm clock ringing while we are in the dream can be incorporated into our dream.  In general, this is still  a very limited form of awareness.

“Waking sleep” is the state that we are in much of the time where we are not fully aware of our surroundings and perform in an habitual manner.  As I understand this, you are simply on autopilot; performing actions without thinking about them.  For example, it is possible to make a car journey and when you arrive, be unaware of the route you had taken or have any memory of the journey.  The mechanical process takes up very little of your thought process and you may, or may not, be occupied with other thoughts.  This does not present a problem with many aspects of life but you can find yourself living on autopilot when making import decisions; not really thinking about them but simply going with your first thought without examining the reasons.  You may also be particularly suggestible when in this state as you will have a tendency to just “go with the flow”.  Often you can get into this state when you are distracted or worried by something.

When you are fully awake you are aware of your surroundings, you are alert, receptive (but not uncritically) and generally will have a feeling of energy.  You will be able to appreciate the beauty around you and will be capable of making rational decisions.  You are not sleeping at any level and are fully in touch with your senses.

Higher consciousness is a more difficult concept for me; one that will take lots of thought.  As far as I understand it, you have an awareness of not just yourself and your senses, but also of your emotions, the wider universe and “spirituality”.  Some quotes should help to illustrate this.

There is but one Reason. The mind that made the world is not one mind, but the mind.

And every work of art is a more or less pure manifestation of the same. Therefore we arrive at this conclusion, which I offer as a confirmation of the whole view, that the delight which a work of art affords, seems to arise from our recognizing in it the mind that formed Nature, again in active operation.

Herein is the explanation of the analogies, which exist in all the arts. They are the re-appearance of one mind, working in many materials to many temporary ends. Raphael paints wisdom, Handel sings it, Phidias carves it, Shakspeare writes it, Wren builds it, Columbus sails it, Luther preaches it, Washington arms it, Watt mechanizes it. Painting was called " silent poetry," and poetry " speaking painting." The laws of each art are convertible into the laws of every other.

- Society and Solitude, Chapter III Art: Ralph Waldo Emerson

Emerson appears to be talking about God and the fact that all of nature is an aspect of God.  We recognise aspects of Godhood in the great works of art; the better the work of art the closer to God it brings us.  The idea here is that we can experience a higher consciousness by contemplating great works of art; we are brought into close contact with the one overriding presence of which we are all a part.

To see a world in a grain of sand
And a heaven in a wild flower,
Hold infinity in the palm of your hand
And eternity in an hour.

- Auguries of  Innocence: William Blake

Blake makes me think of the situation where we can contemplate something very simple and use our imagination to expand our consciousness to encompass much wider areas.  So, we can look at a grain of sand, know about sand and its place in the world and imagine a whole world; we can take the beauty of a flower and image the beauty of heaven; we can hold something insignificant in our hand and use our minds to encompass an infinity of other images and concepts; and we can stretch time taking us out of ourselves; live an eternity in an hour.  With each of these things we use our imaginations to extrapolate from a simple beginning to stretch our consciousness.

Love does not dwell on the gifts received but turns directly to their giver.  Love knows no measure but exceeds all measure.  Love feels no burden; it makes light of labour and strives to do more than it is able.  Love considers nothing impossible and sees itself equal to every task.
Love, therefore, can do all things and finds itself successful where others, without love, often faint and fall prostrate.
Love keeps watch, and even while resting it sleeps not; it may be tired but not fatigued; it may feel under pressure, but not crushed; it may be afraid but not terrified.  Like a living flame and burning torch, love always makes its way upward into the open air and blazes forth.

- Imitation of Christ, Bk3, ch 5: Thomas a Kempis

This is about divine love but we can think about is as love in general and it is certainly recognisable.  Love is certainly an altered state of consciousness and it has the property of making you concerned for someone else’s happiness but I am not entirely convinced that it has the “broadening” effect that other descriptions of higher consciousness have.  To some extent, it seems to me, that the other quotes suggest that getting out of yourself is one of the aspects of higher consciousness; perhaps love can be here as well.

I feel I have got a bit of a better handle on this concept than when I started typing this but there is still lots of thinking to be done.

The study of wisdom allows us to see many of the ideas that have stood the test of time.  The Greek philosophers were the originators of Western philosophy.  Indeed, western philosophy has been described as “footnotes to Plato”.  Plato, himself, is the heart of Greek philosophy; particularly in his writings about Socrates.  It is not obvious how much of the teachings ascribed to Socrates were really his and how much he was simply used as a character by Plato, but we can probably assume that they certainly made an excellent teaching team.  In the Phaedo, Plato describes Socrates last days after he had been sentenced to death.  Socrates idea of the soul is brought out in great detail using the characteristic Socratic method; asking questions of a student to let the student make the argument himself.

The climax of the argument can be summed up in the following extract:

And were we not saying long ago that the soul when using the body as an instrument of perception, that is to say, when using the sense of sight or hearing or some other sense (for the meaning of perceiving through the body is perceiving through the senses)-were we not saying that the soul too is then dragged by the body into the region of the changeable, and wanders and is confused; the world spins round her, and she is like a drunkard when under their influence?

Very true.
But when returning into herself she reflects; then she passes into the realm of purity, and eternity, and immortality, and unchangeableness, which are her kindred, and with them she ever lives, when she is by herself and is not let or hindered; then she ceases from her erring ways, and being in communion with the unchanging is unchanging. And this state of the soul is called wisdom?

- Phaedo: Plato

Plato (or Socrates) describes a state of being which he regarded as “wisdom”.  This state is where the soul (or the self) is not caught up with the body; there is a separation and the soul is contemplating itself.  I think that the group got a bit caught up in the language used here; “soul” is a very loaded word.  I think that the main point is the self reflection; the examining of life that Socrates said made life worth living.  This examination requires some sort of discipline to separate the soul from the body; we would call this meditation.

This self examination should allow us to evaluate the habits and beliefs that we have build up over our life.  We should try to change harmful behaviours and wrong beliefs.  Confucius said that it is easier today to triumph over evil habits than it will be tomorrow.  When we identify something that we want to change, the longer we leave the change, the more ingrained will be the habit so we should start as soon as possible.