Politics (RSS)

Are Scots sectarian?

The Scotsman - Beware myths that tarnish 'sectarian' Scots
How the perception that Scots have of the prevalance of sectarianism is different from reality.

Scotland's Sectarian Songs

spiked-life | Article | Why they're wrong about Scotland's sectarian songs
Somebody gets it right about 'sectarianism' in Scottish football.  It's really rivalry with the tools available.  Football fans like to wind up the opposition and old firm fans are no different.

Chipped Paper

greg hughes - dot - net - RFID chip you can fit in a sheet of paper
An article that's got to make some people more than a little nervous. Imagine if an RFID chip could be embedded in a piece of paper, virtually undetectable.

Recent Links #6

CNN.com - 25 words that hurt your resume - Jan 20, 2006
Instead of making empty claims to demonstrate your work ethic, use brief, specific examples to demonstrate your skills.

tech.memeorandum @ 5:35 PM ET, February 1, 2006
Politicians on Wednesday attacked Google, Microsoft, Cisco Systems and Yahoo for declining to appear at a briefing about China's Internet censorship and called for a new law to outlaw compliance with such requirements. Surely some mistake.

Dare Obasanjo aka Carnage4Life - Luke 6:41
Some of the collateral damage from Bush's war on terror.

Google Earnings Disappoint; Shares Plunge: Financial News - Yahoo! Finance
I'm pretty sure that Google's share price is way too high.

A Sabre Geek: TwoDollarPixel.Com
Innovation Analysis Group has taken the concept to the next level. Not only will they put up an ad link to your web site for $2 a pixel, they will also incorporate their WebMonitorXP tool that will tell the ads owner when someone visits their site.

Mr. Speaker » Blog Archive » Hacking Windows Pinball
Load up the game and type the words hidden test.

Recent Links #5

BibleGateway.com: A searchable online Bible in over 35 languages and 50 versions.
The ideal place to research passages to make the religious look hypocritical or stupid

Scotsman.com Sport - Wallace Mercer dies
Our office landlord and former Hearts chairman dies of cancer.

Learning Philosophy - Lesson 2

The philosophy class that we are taking runs on a Saturday morning at 10am.  This should be pretty convenient for us but this morning we managed to arrive late.  Penny’s car died on her way home last night.  She was too busy panicking to ask what a Wise person would do.  This morning, I had to visit the garage so we arrived at the class 15 minutes late to find Martin all alone; no one else had turned up.  We started anyway and Margaret also arrived 10 minutes later so it was not quite as alive a debate as last week but interesting none the less.

We first of all refreshed what we had covered last week with Martin emphasising that this was “practical philosophy”, so the point is to apply the lessons and live a better life.  I asked about the “State of our being”, a phrase that was used in last week‘s hand-out.  Martin explained this as about how we feel, a state that varies from time to time.  We may be feeling stressed, relaxed, curious, lethargic etc.

Martin then introduced the  subject of principles.  These being beliefs or modes of behaviour that influence how we lead our life.  The actions of a Wise Man are guided by lasting principles rather than by selfish or fleeting concerns.

Examples of this type of principle include:
1. Do to others as you would have others do to you.
2. Live honestly, harm no man and render to each his due.

The most important principle for wisdom is that of self-knowledge.  Doubt about your self is reflected everywhere.  This principle is reflected in many philosophical texts.  For example:
1. Whoever knows essentially his own nature, can know also that of other men and can penetrate into the nature of beings.
2. This above all: to thine ownself be true, And it must follow, as the night the day, Thou canst not then be false to any man.

This principle begs the question of “what is ‘self’?”  We each have different attributes that are displayed at different times in our lives, when we are in different roles and when we are in different states of being.  What is constant between these?  We should learn to appreciate that which is unchanging in our selves.  What is the essence of our selves?  Part of this is made up of our identity.  Our identity is not simply formed by our experiences; there is also a part made from our innate nature; our genetic heritage. 

This is illustrated by the tale of a lion cub that is brought up as a sheep.  He behaves exactly like a sheep while that is his only frame of reference.  One day, an adult lion comes along and roars at the flock of sheep.  They all run off, but the lion stays; it recognises an affinity for this other creature; maybe just a similarity of form, but maybe a deeper affinity.  The lion cub follows the lion, is taken under the influence of the lion and from that point on acts like a lion.

Real life examples of this sort of thing seem to show that the lion cub could never really be one or the other.  It will always be different; never fully part of either group.  This reminded me very much of Stranger in a Strange Land.  The human child, Mike, is brought up by an alien race and adopts their frame of reference.  When “rescued” and brought back to human society, he struggles to make the adjustment.  He does not feel part of the human race but eventually recognises that he is more human than alien.

Another important principle is that of neither accepting nor rejecting but putting into practice.  Ideas that are put to you should not be dismissed out of hand; neither should they be accepted uncritically.  Instead, they should be tried out and the results observed. 

An example of this is the story from Bede’s History of the English Church and People.  When Augustine came to England to preach to the natives, the Saxon King, Ethelbert, listened to what he had to say and did not accept or reject it.  Instead, acting for his kingdom, he allowed Augustine to preach and evaluated the results.  It is important to observe the results of an action before you can evaluate a theory.  This is the basis of the scientific method but is also vital in the evaluations performed by the wise.

This is related to the principle of having an open mind.  Hear with an open mind; apply your learning and observe the effect.

Nan-in, a Japanese master during the Meiji era (1868-1912), received a university professor who came to inquire about Zen.

Nan-in served Tea. He poured his visitor's cup full, and then kept on pouring.
The professor watched the overflow until he no longer could restrain himself. "It is overfull. No more will go in!"

"Like this cup," Nan-in said, "you are full of your own opinions and speculations. How can I show you Zen unless you first empty your cup?"

We all have “opinions and speculations”; most of what we do and think is by habit.  We should examine our habits and bring our reason to bear on them.  Are they reasonable? 

We should also continue to ask what a wise man or woman would do.

And keep practicing the exercise from lesson 1.


Stranger in a Strange Land

There are some experiences that everyone should have in adolescence.  Things like your first political thoughts, a re-appraisal of your parents’ attitude to religion and, of course, your first experiments with masturbation.  Robert A. Heinlein’s “Stranger in a Strange Land” covers all of those themes and should also be an integral part of any adolescent’s experience.

I first read it in my late teens and it made a profound impression on me, opening up a world where things could be different from society‘s norm.  It focused many of the questions that were playing on my mind at that time although I came to different conclusions on many issues to the author’s surrogate, Jubal Harshaw.

First published in 1961, it caused a sensation with it’s controversial spin on religion, politics and sexuality.  Despite being a commercially successful author, Heinlein had to shorten the book by 60,000 words before a publisher would take a risk on it.  Forty five years later, a lot has changed in our society but there are still plenty of people who will be shocked by what is Heinlein’s most ambitious work.

The basic story is of a man, Valentine Michael Smith, raised by an alien species, who is returned to Earth.  It follows his adventures as he gets to grips with the complex human society armed with a completely alien world view.  At first he is overwhelmed and very little makes sense to him but as he learns about human society he eventually gets to grips with his own identity and then starts a movement that will have profound effects on humanity. 

I have just re-read it and like many of the things that make a big impression on us in our youth, it seems to have subtly changed when re-read as an adult.  In this case, not all of the changes were subjective.  With the author’s death, his wife, Virginia has authorised the release of the original uncut version.   This has substantially the same plot and it is not immediately obvious that the longer version was significantly better.  However, it still reads very easily and my memory of the shorter version will be fairly hazy after two decades.

It is set in a future that is remarkably like 1960.  The science fiction elements are really there to support the basic premise of a child raised by aliens.  The clash of cultures that this allows is what the book is about.  It allows Heinlein to espouse his opinions and satirise many of the foibles of mid 20th century American culture.  There is much to satirise here but this does tend to date as that society has changed in many ways in the intervening years; much more profoundly in many ways than Heinlein could have imagined. Heinlein produced this book at a time that was ripe for change in American society and the book found itself on the crest of all of the changes that started in the 1960s.

Heinlein had a surrogate in many of his novels; a character who would espouse the author’s opinions; sometimes to great length, and I mostly found this character to be fairly irritating as a youth.  Heinlein was basically a conservative, with intellectual leanings towards libertarianism but was often instinctively reactionary.  In “Stranger in a Strange Land”, Heinlein set out to shock, and some of it still shocks, but often for it’s reactionary content rather than it’s liberalism.  I may have mellowed in my later years, though, as I no longer find his opinions quite so annoying.  I can see that he was a creature of his time and that he was often unable to see beyond his prejudices.

Heinlein was not a great writer or a great story teller; his characters tended to be there for a purpose other than being living characters; and his dialog tended to move between the inane and the pontificating.  Despite all of these failings, “Stranger in a Strange Land” still manages to be a great book and like much of science fiction it is the ideas that are the mainstay.  

Charles Kennedy Deserves No Sympathy

I find it difficult to find much sympathy for ministers or party leaders who lose their position.  They know the job that they are taking on and that it could turn nasty on them.  Resigning is part of the job. 

Politicians get a bit hypocritical when they try to claim the moral high ground with this behaviour.  For instance, the BBC had a clash with the government and various members of the government suggested that if staff at the BBC had been politicians then they would have resigned.  This sounds like a reasonable argument until you remember that members of the government only resign their ministerial position.  You virtually never hear of someone resigning as a Member of Parliament because of incompetence or a scandal. 

So, if someone resigns from a ministerial post they are in fact still in a job with a salary of £59,095, more than twice the national average.  A bit different from someone resigning from a post that actually allows them to live.